Track and limit · free tool

Jalwa Game Colour History Analyser

Updated 8 October 2026 · 5 minute read

A friend says 7 keeps coming up and the last 120 results prove it. Paste the list and the tool counts it, checks its streaks and runs, and compares each number with random lists of the same length. It never says what comes next.

Tool · runs in your browserNothing is uploaded

Type or paste them. Spaces, commas, new lines or nothing between results all work. In digits mode every digit is one result, and big means 5 to 9 and small 0 to 4 (the common description; if your app shows big and small differently, paste its own B and S results in two-sides mode). In colours mode use G, R and V, or the words green, red, violet.

Try an example:
120digits read
p = 0.002digit counts against the expected shares: unusual for random
7longest streak, big or small (usually 7 in a list this long)
61%of random lists this long hold a streak that long
17%of 1,000 random lists the same length looked unusual on at least one check
4.2%looked unusual on the counts alone (the 5% line)
55 runsabout 61 expected: consistent with random
17 of 33bets “the opposite after 3 in a row” that came off (50% by chance): consistent with random

1 of the 5 checks on these 120 digits looks unusual for random: the counts. Random lists this long look unusual on at least one check 17% of the time, so one odd check proves little, and none of it says anything about the next result.

What was checked in these 120 digits
CheckYour listRandom listsVerdict
Count of each digitχ² = 26.5 on 9 degrees of freedomusually below 16.9Unusual for random (p = 0.002)
Big against small64 big, 56 smallabout 60 eachConsistent with random (p = 0.47)
Longest streak (big or small)7 big in a rowusually 7; 7 or more in 61% of random listsConsistent with random (p = 0.61)
Runs (how often the result switches)55 runsabout 60.7 (usually 50 to 71)Consistent with random (p = 0.33)
Bet the opposite after 3 in a row17 of 33 (52%)50% (usually 33% to 67% for 33 bets)Consistent with random (p = 1.00)

Random lists look odd too

This draws 1,000 random lists the same length as yours, runs the same checks on each and counts how many look unusual. It uses random numbers from your browser on your own device. There is no money in it, nothing is saved or sent, and it is not any app’s game.

The tool above opens on a list that was made on purpose to be lopsided: 120 digits where 7 is three times as likely as each of the others. It reads one check as unusual and four as ordinary. Everything below explains why, so you can read your own list the same way. It is one of two tools on this site with a page of its own, and the tools page lists the other nine.

What goes in

You choose what you are pasting: digits (0 to 9), colours (green, red, violet, or G, R, V) or two-way (any two kinds of result, such as B and S or big and small). Spaces, commas and dashes between results are ignored. Anything that cannot be a result is skipped and reported, never guessed at. The tool needs at least 10 results and reads up to 5,000. Tick the box if your list starts with the newest result.

The five checks in plain words

CheckThe question it asksWhat it needs
CountsDo the digits (or colours) turn up in their expected shares?About 50 digits, so each digit is expected 5 times
Big against smallDigits only: are 0 to 4 and 5 to 9 about even?The same
Longest streakHow often do random lists this long hold a run this long?10 results
RunsDoes the result switch sides as often as chance would?Two kinds of result
Bet the opposite after NWhen the last N matched, how often did the next one differ?10 such places

Each check ends in one of three verdicts: consistent with random, unusual for random, or too few results to say. “Unusual” means the p-value is under 0.05. A p-value is the chance that a random list looks at least this odd.

One list that is flagged, one that is not

Sample listCountsLongest streakOpposite after 3Verdicts
100 digits from a fair generatorχ² = 10.4, usually below 16.9 (p = 0.32)7 small in a row, in 54% of random lists14 of 24 (58%)All 5 consistent
120 digits where 7 is three times as likelyχ² = 26.5, usually below 16.9 (p = 0.002)7 big in a row, in 61% of random lists17 of 33 (52%)Counts unusual, 4 consistent

The check that fires is the one that matches how the list was made. A list with a favourite digit trips the counts, and nothing else moves: streaks and runs read ordinary. A list that swaps sides too often trips the runs. The tool names which check is unusual, so you can see what kind of oddity it is.

The one in six rule

Random lists this long read unusual on at least one check 17% of the time, and the counts check alone fires on about 4% to 5% of them. That is how the 5% line is built. So a single unusual check has three possible causes: a slip in copying, plain chance, or something about how the rounds were made. A list alone cannot separate the last from the first two. Press “Draw 1,000 random lists” to see how often chance alone gives a list like yours.

When your own list is flagged

  1. Count the results the tool says it read, and compare with your screen. A missing round or a pasted period number is the commonest cause.
  2. Paste a longer history if your screen has one. Fifty results prove little, and five hundred prove more.
  3. Look at which check fired. A flag on the counts says one result is turning up too often or too rarely in this list. It does not say it will turn up next.
  4. Keep the verdict about the list. The tool cannot see how any platform makes its results, and neither can we.

For the common claims behind these lists, the big and small page tests a streak and the games guide prices a session.

What the tool cannot do

It cannot tell you the next result, and no tool can. It does not know Jalwa Game’s rules, so its split of 0 to 4 and 5 to 9 and its colours are the common description, not the platform’s. It cannot say whether a game is fair, and it cannot rate a platform. A clean verdict means only that your list looks like a random one.

Checked a list and want to see the platform’s own page? Read the address bar before you type anything, and set a limit first.

Log in or register on Jalwa Game

Opens the platform’s own page in a new tab. Referral link. 18+ only.

Common questions

How many results should I paste into the analyser?

At least 10 are needed, and about 50 digits before the counts check will judge. The tool says so when a check is left out. With 5,000 results you get the narrowest bands, and the lists you paste are best taken straight from your own screen.

Can I paste colours instead of digits?

Yes. Choose colours and write the results as green, red and violet, or as G, R and V. If you paste digits in colours mode, the tool turns each into a colour using the common description (green 1, 3, 7, 9; red 2, 4, 6, 8; violet 0 and 5) and says that it did.

What does the “bet the opposite after N in a row” box do?

It sets N, from 2 to 8. The tool then finds every place where the last N results matched and counts how often the next one differed. By chance that is half the time. It needs at least 10 such places before it will judge the rule.

Does a flagged list mean the rounds were not random?

No. It means this list is unusual for random, and random lists of this length read unusual on at least one check about 17% of the time. A copying slip is a likelier cause than anything else. We cannot see inside any platform, so the tool says nothing about how Jalwa Game makes its results.

Why does the tool ask me to leave out period numbers?

A period number is a long run of digits that names a round. It is not a result. If it is left in, the tool reads it one digit at a time and the counts are wrong. It warns you when it sees long and short groups of digits mixed together.

Is the list I paste stored or sent anywhere?

No. The tool runs in your browser and sends nothing. A button can copy a link that holds your list in its address, which is only worth pressing if you want to share the list yourself.

More on tools